I call this the vanilla BDSM batch of Disney Porn, made for the post-Fifty Shades of Gray audience. The sexuality in these is not only soft core, it's pretty. The BDSM is light, jaunty, amused, playful, loving. The couples are sharing a wicked secret that is oh so delicious. I feel as if I've become jaded, and these healthy, positive images should be mocked. After all, isn't that what the hardcore Disney porn does? Mock the puritanical, innocent, naive nature of the stories and characters?
But why should it be mocked? Why shouldn't Disney characters be positive images? Because then one of the biggest corporations on the planet would be doing something good? And that's not something a liberal wants to admit? Very likely.
But these images weren't put out by Disney. And now that I think about it, these are all BDSM images where the man is the dominant and the woman submissive. A sexist posture, but also an attitude that would appeal to most women. Because, from the statistics I keep reading and hearing about, most women find the role of submissive to be very sexually exciting.
And, MY BOOK, MY BOOK, MY BOOK: Dying in Pleasure
But these images weren't put out by Disney. And now that I think about it, these are all BDSM images where the man is the dominant and the woman submissive. A sexist posture, but also an attitude that would appeal to most women. Because, from the statistics I keep reading and hearing about, most women find the role of submissive to be very sexually exciting.
And, MY BOOK, MY BOOK, MY BOOK: Dying in Pleasure
RSS Feed
